Look for narrow pins, uneven spacing, and faint scribe lines trailing beyond the tails. Chisel chatter inside sockets and slightly crowned baselines tell of muscle, not machinery. Eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries favored elegance over standardization, so variance is a virtue. If you find wedges of compressed end grain, witness marks from a marking gauge, and tool bruising at corners, you are likely touching something shaped by lamplight, a practiced hand, and the rhythm of a bench hook rather than a production jig.
Uniform spacing, identical pin widths, and crisp, slightly rounded internal radii often announce a jig or factory process. Post–1860 production increases consistency, and by the early twentieth century many shops favored repeatable setups. Router-bit curvature leaves readable fingerprints inside corners. When every tail looks cloned and the baselines are dead even without wander, consider later manufacture. Still, regional craft revivals can reproduce old methods, so pair observations with corroborating evidence elsewhere, like fasteners, saw marks, and finish behavior along hidden edges.
Drawer fronts typically hide half-blind joints, where small surface fissures and tear-out around pins can signal chisels rather than bits. Through dovetails on carcases reveal more, especially if the tails stand proud and were planed flush by hand. Watch for end-grain oxidation that matches surrounding surfaces, not freshly scraped brightness. If the inside shows slightly irregular gauge-line depths and the outside corners display softened wear consistent with use, you may be dating not just a piece but the rhythm of its working life.